Thursday, August 30, 2012

Calif court upholds state apple moth plan - Sacramento Bee

A California court on Wednesday gave the go-ahead to a controversial state plan to control and eradicate the crop-damaging light brown apple moth.

But the ruling in Sacramento Superior Court prohibited the California Department of Food and Agriculture from using aerial spraying to control the Australian pest.

Health and environmental organizations had challenged the plan, arguing that officials understated the human and animal health risks of pesticide exposure and overstated the moth's potential impact on crops.

The court denied their petition, but put some limitations on the plan, ordering an environmental review in five years.

Agriculture authorities argued that the moth could cause billions of dollars in losses by damaging everything from apples to grapes and berries.

The moth was first spotted in California in 2007 and was detected in more than a dozen counties, prompting the government to bombard the Monterey Bay area with 1,600 pounds of pesticides to eradicate it.

The aerial spraying drew complaints from hundreds of residents of Santa Cruz and Monterey counties, who said they fell sick after authorities sprayed residential areas. State officials said the spraying was safe, but they put it on hold and prepared an environmental review.

While the state cannot use aerial spraying methods, the plan approved by the court permits the use of pesticides to control the moth.

The plan focuses on controlling the moth by applying pesticides from truck based or backpack spray equipment, and by applying pesticides through plastic twist ties tossed into pest affected areas.

The court found that the state's review of these pesticide applications showed sufficient evidence that they do not pose a risk to humans or wildlife.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

No comments:

Post a Comment